Compare 911 GTS Generations: 997 vs 991.1 vs 991.2 vs 992

Porsche delivered the first 911 GTS as a 2011 model.  It was a swansong to the 997.2 generation cars as the 991 launch was impending.  That first release brought us extra power, an improved chassis set-up, plus interior and exterior design changes all delivered in a naturally aspirated, two-wheel drive, wide body car.

Within a few years of the 991.1 generation launch, a refreshed 911 GTS was available as a 2015 model, and then again in 2017 and 2022 for the 991.2 and 992 generations, respectively.

Although the essence of the 911 GTS has remained constant through the years, Porsche introduced changes along the way.  Perhaps most notable was the switch to a turbo-charged engine to meet stricter emissions standards while still advancing the performance of the car.

I’ve spent hours behind the wheel of the 1st two generations of 911 GTSs, and recently had a chance to compare them with the latest model.  In researching a post I wrote about the experience, I struggled to find a single source that compared the specs for all 4 generations.

So I created one to share here:

Shaded cells denote changes from the prior generation.

Of all the changes from one generation to the next, the two areas that resonate for me most relate to power and weight.

When comparing the 997 generation GTS to the newer generations, I’ve often said that with one you get more S while the others give you more T.  The swiftness or nimbleness of the 997 is likely influenced by its lower curb weight.  The graph below helps to visualize how the weight as changed since 2011.

While power has increased with each generation, that “punch in the back” you feel when mashing the accelerator in the turbo-charged cars is a direct result of the increased torque.  The graph below shows a marked increase in torque between the 991.1 and 991.2 generations; a change that coincides with the addition of the turbo.

If you are cross-shopping the 911 GTS generations or simply interested in knowing more about the cars, I hope this information is useful.

Porsche 911 GT3 behind a GTS coupe and cabriolet.

Comparing the 911 Carrera GTS with the 911 GT3

A common critique of the 911 model range focuses on the fact that so many different models exist.  Porsche even produced a video in 2018 hoping to quickly explain the twenty-four derivatives they offered at the time.  

When contemplating the various models in the 911 range, it’s helpful to consider the use case.  Porsche has so many use cases covered in the modern 911; even one targeted for offroad use thanks to the Dakar.  

Porsche 911 Dakar in Roughroads livery.
Porsche 911 Dakar

While it’s far more common for buyers to cross shop the GTS with a Carrera S, comparisons between the GTS and GT3 are also made.  Despite looking similar to the untrained eye, the GTS and GT3 are quite different, and one of the best ways to understand the differences is by considering their use cases.

When asked to compare the two models, most Porsche enthusiasts would offer a summary of the GTS as a street car confident on the track, and the GT3 as a track car tolerable on the street.  This post will attempt to illustrate why this assertion is true by comparing the horsepower and torque specifications for the two cars.

The table below shows horsepower and torque for all 911 generations to date that include both a GTS and GT3.

A table that compares the Porsche 911 GTS vs. GT3 horsepower and torque.
Porsche 911 GTS vs. GT3 HP & Torque

In every generation, the GT3 produces more horsepower and at a higher RPM than the GTS.  The higher horsepower aligns well with the GT3 billing as a track car tolerable on the street.  Race cars prioritize horsepower, particularly in the higher RPM range, to achieve top speeds on straightaways and maximize overall performance. This design choice ensures engines capable of revving to high RPMs and producing substantial power output, optimizing top-end performance necessary to maintain high speeds on tracks with long straights.

In contrast, street cars prioritize torque, particularly in the lower RPM range, to optimize low-speed performance for everyday driving situations.  Designers balance the curve to enhance low-end torque as this improves responsiveness and drivability, making street cars suitable for a wide range of driving conditions.

Comparing the torque of the two cars shows that the GTS produces essentially the same amount as or more than the GT3, and at a lower RPM.  The difference is even more pronounced beginning with the 991.2 generation as the GTS was delivered with a turbocharged motor.  Turbocharging allows the engine to generate more power from each combustion cycle, resulting in increased torque even at lower engine speeds.  Turbocharged engines typically have a wider power band in comparison to naturally aspirated engines like those used in the GT3. This improved low-end torque enhances the acceleration and responsiveness, making the GTS more capable across the range of driving conditions more common on the street.

The GT3 race car vs. GTS street car is a popular comparison among automotive enthusiasts on YouTube.  In a video by TheGetawayer, you can learn more from Guido about other differences between the GTS and GT3 that he found meaningful; and in Matt’s reviews on TheSmokingTire, he calls the the 991.2 GTS the “perfect road spec” and the 992 GTS the “perfect Porsche street car”.

AI generated image of a GTS-based special edition Porsche 911. This car is the Porsche FT which celebrates free-moving traffic.

Compare Porsche 911 Models Based on the Carrera GTS

At times it seems Porsche has a special edition for every occasion: one for morning drives, another for celebrating Tuesdays, one for when the moon is full, and even one for the rare days when traffic is actually moving smoothly.  At this rate, we might eventually see a special edition Porsche commemorating the anniversary of the last special edition.

Putting humor aside, when you modify a car that’s already so unique, it’s hard not to be impressed. As we witness the increasing number of special edition Porsches based on the 911 GTS, we can’t help but have an appreciation for the trend.

The GTS-based special edition cars seem to follow one of three paths outlined in the following table:

Table compares the GTS-based special edition cars that are available in the US market. It is ordered by announcement date within each column.
US Models ordered by announcement date within each column.

The “GTS All the Way” models consist of special editions that are clearly marked with a GTS badge.  The first offered being the Brumos B59 Edition cars (more to come below).

There is just one “GTS in Camouflage” model which represents cars that included some cosmetic differences in the design.  The Porsche 50th Anniversary model was announced prior to the release of the 991 GTS.  While the car is officially badged as a Carrera S, features such as the wide body design with a  2 wheel drive transmission, lowered ride height, and factory installed Power Kit all point towards the GTS model that appeared soon after.

Finally, “GTS with a Twist” represents special editions that are based heavily on the GTS, but include cosmetic and mechanical differences.  In a prior post, we made the case for the 997 GTS Cabriolet and the 997 Speedster being not identical, but fraternal twins.

In time, we’ll work to share more about each of these remarkable cars as they all merit their moment in the spotlight.  For the remainder of this post, we’ll focus on the Brumos B59 Edition cars.

A rear three quarter view of the Brumos B59 Carrera GTS Special Edition.
Brumos B59 Carrera 911 GTS Special Edition.

If scarcity is one of the defining qualities of a special edition, then the Brumos B59 Edition cars are among the most special ever built by Porsche.  Just five were built by Porsche to pay homage to Burmos driver Hurley Haywood’s impressive record of five overall wins at the Daytona 24 Hours.  

Since these cars are badged as GTS models, there are only minor styling differences from the normal 997 GTS spec: 

Exterior Styling: The B59 Edition features the iconic Brumos Racing livery, including Carrara White paint adorned with red and blue striping.  Additionally, the exterior mirrors are finished in black.  The cars are fitted with 19-inch Sport Classic Fuchs-style wheels to complement their sporting appearance and as a throwback to the original Carrera RSR raced by Haywood.

Interior Styling: The interior of the B59 Edition includes the black full-leather finish with Alcantara trim.  Notable difference from the standard GTS interior are the blue and red dual-stripe stitching on the steering wheel rim, shifter boot, and brake handle.  The console and the rear portions of the heated memory Adaptive Sport Seats are painted in Carrara White, with Guards Red seat belts.  The door entry guards are made of stainless steel and engraved with Hurley Haywood’s signature.  Each car also includes a special interior badge indicating it’s position among the group of five. 

Four of the 5 cars are featured in a video co-produced by Brumos; it’s worth the watch. https://frazerspowart.com/the-b59-story

Porsche 997 Carrera GTS view from the front passenger side corner.

 

Compare a 911 Wide Body GTS with a Narrow Body Carrera S.

The distinctive wide body design is a hallmark of the 911 GTS.  The GTS was one of the few ways to own a naturally aspirated, two-wheel drive wide body Porsche 911 during the 997 and 991.1 generations.   Turbos became standard on all Carrera models including the GTS starting with the 991.2 generation, and all 911 models were designed as wide bodies beginning with the 992 generation.

We’ve explored the history of the wide body in a prior post which includes a table illustrating the two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated models sold in the US.  It covers each generation from the original 911 to the 992, and has been a popular resource for readers.

This post will focus more on the performance advantages brought by the wide body design which relate to traction and suspension dynamics.

A wide body design provides space for a bigger tire, and a bigger tire results in a larger contact patch.  Tire Rack offers a great resource to help visualize how the size of the contact patch affects performance.  In simple terms, larger contact patches are more effective in converting the driver’s input into responsive handling, cornering stability and great dry traction; all qualities that we enjoy behind the steering wheel of a sports car.

Turning our attention to the Porsche 911, it’s helpful to compare the tire sizes between a wide body Carrera GTS and a narrow body Carrera S.  The illustration below shows the difference in rear tire sizes between the 997 generation cars.  The contact patch on the GTS is ~5% larger which would provide improved traction over the Carrera S.

Differences in Tire Size between the Porsche 997 GTS and Carrera S.
Differences in Tire Size between the GTS and Carrera S.

With traction covered, let’s consider how a wide body design affects suspension dynamics.  In simple terms, stability is increased as the wheels are pushed outward from the centerline of the car.  This is measured as track, and cars with a wider track benefit from less body roll and over/under steer.    

Once again comparing the wide body Carrera GTS with the narrow body Carrera S from the 997 generation shows a difference in track of approximately 1.25 inches; a difference that yields an advantage to the the GTS when considering suspension dynamics.

Differences in Track between the Porsche 997 GTS and Carrera S.
Differences in Track between the GTS and Carrera S.

Characteristics like handling, stability and traction are also affected by the weight of the car, tire pressures and sidewall stiffness, as well other factors.  As we’re comparing two models from the 997 Carrera generation, these factors are largely similar for the analysis presented.

Compare the 992 GTS with the 991.1 and 997 Generations.

The formula for the 1st two generations of the 911 GTS was consistent.  Extra power, improved chassis, and a few extra cosmetic bits all delivered in a naturally aspirated, two-wheel drive, wide body car.  It was this last part that made the model somewhat exclusive as the GTS was one of the few possible paths to buy a naturally aspirated, two-wheel drive, wide body 911 Porsche. 

Things started to change with the 991.2 model.  To balance emissions with the unwritten rule that each new generation performs better than the last, Porsche transitioned to turbo-charged engines for all 991.2 Carreras.  They didn’t stop there.  As a nod to wide body cars looking and handling better, Porsche announced that all 911 models would be wide body beginning with the 992 generation.

In this drive forward, the GTS lost some of what made it special.  In the past, it wasn’t possible to configure a Carrera S as a GTS from the factory, and it wouldn’t be practical to do it in the aftermarket.  If you wanted a 911 GTS, then you had to buy one.

Porsche still won’t let you select most of the GTS options when configuring your Carrera S from the factory.  Since many of the features that define a GTS in the 992 are cosmetic or “bolt-on” though, it’s never been easier to home brew a GTS.

As a GTS enthusiast, I have mixed thoughts about this evolution of the model.  On one hand, I appreciate the exclusivity of the original GTS formula.  On the other, the exclusivity seems to matter more “on paper” than the street.  Buy these cars to drive them rather than focusing on them as an investment.

The History of Wide Body and Why it Matters is a top ranked GTSence post that delves into why this set-up looks and handles better.  Porsche’s decision to move all Carreras to a wide body design is ultimately positive, since drivers of all 911 models benefit.

The move to turbos for all Carreras is more of a give & take.  On the downside, increased complexity of the motor could ultimately affect durability and maintenance costs, and the addition of a “filter” in the exhaust track muffles the engine noise we love to hear.

It’s hard to appreciate the positives without driving the car though.  I’ve spent hours in the earlier generations of the 911 GTS.  Thanks to the Porsche Experience Center, I finally had the chance to compare the 992 GTS with the 991.1 and 997 generations.

I’ll start with the biggest difference that I noticed between the 992 GTS and the earlier cars.  The torque is incredible.  The naturally aspirated cars are fast by any standard, but they lack that “punch in the back” that comes from a car with 420 ft-lb of torque.  I won’t dwell on it.  Go drive one.  You’ll be amazed by the difference.

While I still think a naturally aspirated engine offers a better sound, I’ll admit that the 992 GTS delivers an exhaust note that is impressive.  Despite the turbo “filter” the car still makes head turning noises that enthusiast love.  It was best in Sport mode as Sport+ eliminates some of the cracks and burbles.  While true that some of these sounds are engineered, it’s hard not to smile when the symphony begins.

Handling is exceptional, and the chance to run the paces at Porsche Experience Center really helps to show the capability of the car in a short, 90 minute session.  The 992 feels more like the 991.1 than the 997.  They’re all GTSs, but the later generation cars give you more T than S as I’ve written in the past.

As a purist, I still prefer my naturally aspirated cars to the turbos.  It might be nice to add a 992 to the garage though.  Maybe a targa to go with the coupe and cabriolet?

How Many 991 GTS Coupes are Identical to My Car?

After discovering that my 997 GTS is rare, I started to wonder about my 991.1 GTS.  While the data was readily available to analyze the former, this just wasn’t the case for the later.  Total production stats have been shared, but you need the build data to really hone in.

The eureka moment came one afternoon.  I could use sampling to draw a more detailed profile of the population of 1,245 US 991.1 GTS coupes.

A quick refresher on statistics showed that I’d need details on ~65 cars for a confidence level of 90% and a margin of error of 10%, the lowest statistically acceptable ranges in the tool that I used to calculate a sample size.

Next, I used a random number generator to arrive at a range of VINs and set off to do the ‘pick & shovel’ work at VIN Analytics, manually entering VINs until I found enough GTS coupes to run the analysis.  This proved to be quite tedious after only a few attempts.

Before slipping too far down that slope, I reached out to the team at VIN Analytics and explained what I hoped to accomplish.  Thankfully they offered to send me a data set so I could sidestep looking for the needles in the haystack!  (Add their site to your favorites.  It provides a wealth of data on Porsche cars, and they are all-around great guys!)

With the tedious work aside, I flexed the spreadsheet muscles (e.g.  =INDEX,=COUNTIF) to run the analysis. 

Let’s start with a question that always seems top of mind: the ratio of manual transmissions to PDK.  Color me surprised as only 53% of the cars in the sample were delivered with a PDK transmission.  I expected the mix to be more consistent with the 997 GTS.

The data for 991.1 cars only includes coupes, while the 997 data includes all models.  It’s pure speculation, but perhaps the inclusion of cabriolets in the 997 mix increases the portion of PDK cars.

Next up on the analysis is color, and another surprise.  My 991 GTS is a Voodoo Blue PTS car, and I expected that option to be a rare choice.  The data shows something different.

The sample data set included a Rennsport Reunion car and a few Club Coupes.  The build sheets list these packages as PTS cars, but they are somewhat different than a traditional PTS car IMHO.  The factory chose them, not the buyer.  If we exclude these cars from the analysis on color, then PTS drops to ~5% of the sample.

One other surprise on color is the relatively low number delivered in black; roughly 7% of the 991.1 cars (i.e. Jet Black Metallic + Black) vs. a third of the 997 GTS generation. 

With transmission and color settled, next I looked at a set of the options on my car.

As I learned with the 997 GTS analysis, it’s the small things that make these cars unique.  Not surprisingly, my car was the only one in the sample with the Sport Chrono Clock Dial in Racing Yellow. 

The option that makes my 991.1 GTS unique: Sport Chrono Clock Dial in Racing Yellow.

 

Similarly, it’s the only car in the sample with both SportDesign and a rear wiper.

 

In this last table, I thought to share a set of other options that enthusiasts may find interesting.

Eventually, we may see data for the full range of cars, but for now this sampling is the most complete analysis that I’ve seen.   If you have a 991.1 GTS, I hope this helps you understand more about your car.

How Many 997 GTS Cabriolets are Identical to My Car?

No two are alike and any self respecting Porsche owner can prove it to you!  Jokes aside, with 997 GTS values rising and anecdotes about buyers searching for years to find the right car, I started to wonder how many 997 GTS cabriolets are identical to my car.

Remember the Great Recession?  Without even considering models and options, tough economic times meant lower production overall.  Like most manufacturers, Porsche lowered output during this period.  The stats show that 997.2 production accounted for only ~35% of the overall 997 run.

Using the same data to focus the lens, we can see that GTSs only represented ~9% of the total 997.2 production.  While the GTS model isn’t ‘numbered’, they were produced in limited quantities.  Add that ~60% of the GTSs were delivered as coupes, and it was starting to look good for my cabriolet.  If only I could get more details on how the cars were spec-ed.

While it was widely believed that Porsche built most 997.2s with the new PDK transmission, it wasn’t until @Prairiedawg, @BodyinWhite, @bluelines1974, and @nwGTS did the pick & shovel work outlined in this Rennlist post to show the mix between cars with manual transmissions and the PDK.

While their aim was to prove that most GTSs were delivered with the PDK transmission, the pivot table they produced provided the missing link I needed to answer my question.  I was able to identify VINs for the 21 Meteor Grey 997 GTS Cabriolets delivered with a manual transmission in the US. 

Armed with VINs for the 21 cars, I turned to VINanalytics for the option list on each car.  I did see a few discrepancies in their free data.  After contacting VINAnalytics directly and running a few VIN searches independently, I was able to produce an accurate profile of the 21 cars.

The mash-up allowed me to compare how my 997 GTS spec compares to the overall population of Meteor Grey Cabriolets delivered with a manual transmission in the US:

You can see from the table that I have a ‘1 of 1’ car as mine is the only one spec-ed with the Alcantara Storage Lid with Logo (see featured image above for a partial shot of this unexpected difference maker).  It’s a small difference, but I’ll take it!

Two of the rare options in one shot: Cabriolet Roof in Stone Grey and Wheels Paint in Exterior Color.

Twelve of the other cars have ‘1 of 1’ options also making them unique.  In my opinion, the most interesting of the unique options is the car spec-ed with PCCBs.  Most of the other unique specs are cosmetic like the Alcantara Storage Lid.  One car has 5 options that aren’t included on any of the other 20 cars, although on average each unique car has just 1 unique option.

Sadly, I also learned that at least one of the 21 cars is wrecked.

If you have a 997 GTS, use the data I’ve shared here to run your own analysis.  While it’s fun to have a ‘1 of 1’ car, there is so much more to like about the GTS than the stats!

Comparing Porsche 997 and 991 Manual Transmissions

Let’s start with the fact that neither feels as good as the S2000 manual transmission.  In fairness, I’ve yet to drive any manual transmission that felt as good as the S2000.  Many say that you can ‘get close’ with the Numeric Racing shifter and cables.  I’ve not experienced a 911 with this set-up, so I can’t confirm if the claim is just Internet lore or truth.

This post really isn’t about how it feels rowing the shifter or the precision of the linkage.  It’s more about how gearing affects the drive when comparing the Porsche 997 and 991 manual transmissions.

I’ve described the 991 GTS as giving you more T and the 997 GTS as giving you more S.  I think the differences in gearing help to explain this impression.  The 991 is a better Grand Tourer for a number of reasons and the extra overdrive gear is one of them; true to form on long stretches of highway.  Similarly, the sportiness of the 997, including its gearing, is evident in the right scenario.

I’m fortunate to live within an hour of some of the best driving roads in the country, and I enjoy them as often as possible.  These outings typically include a run through the twists & turns of mountain roads.  I prefer the 997’s 6 speed transmission on this type of spirited drive.  I find it easier to manage the torque of the engine which gives the feeling of more precise control.  I’ll rarely use the brakes since the speed of the car is so easy to manipulate with just the throttle.  I think the gearing plays a major role in this part of the experience.

When driving the same mountain roads, the 991’s 7 speed transmission just never feels like it’s in the right gear; either the speed or the RPMs always seem too high.  I brake more often and change between gears more frequently trying to find the right part of the powerband for the next climb.

As I’ve tried to learn more about how the gearing affects the drive, I noticed a difference between the lower gear ratios in the 997 and 991:

As you can see in the table, 2nd and 3rd gear are slightly shorter in the 997 (i.e. higher numbers).  The science says that shorter gears improve acceleration and make the car more performance-oriented.  As most of the mountain driving is in 2nd and 3rd gear, the difference in gear ratios would seem to explain why the 997 feels more suited for the role.

It’s not just the overdrive gear in the 991 that makes it a better Grand Tourer.  Taller gears (i.e. lower numbers) are better for gas mileage which is an important consideration on longer trips.

Two other minor points worth mentioning in a comparison of the 997 and 991 are also transmission related.  The 991 includes an Auto Rev-Match which blips the throttle during downshifts.  Porsche should have included a button to disable it.  In a dig against the 997, the shift into 1st gear is somewhat stubborn when the transmission is cold.  Other owners have suggested trying Motul over Mobile, though the change didn’t seem to make a difference for me. 

The 911 GTS Cabriolet is a Speedster for Drivers

The OG Speedster was a Chapman-esque model launched by Porsche in 1953 to simplify and add lightness to the 356.  The first 911 Speedster came in 1988 with its shortened/raked windshield and double-bubble humps behind the cockpit; next came the 964 Speedster in 1993, exactly two 993 Speedsters in 1995 (one each for Ferdinand Alexander Porsche and Jerry Seinfeld), a 997 Speedster in 2010, and most recently the 991 Speedster in 2019.  Much could be written about each of these models, but in this post we’ll focus on the 997.

997 Speedster.  Photo courtesy of Porsche.

Although the 997 Speedster paid homage to the original with a production run limited to 356 units, it was more of an exercise in badge engineering than simplifying and adding lightness.  Witness the complexity of the clamshell covering the convertible top storage area as proof that neither of these design elements were in focus by 2010, but that’s not to say that the 997 Speedster is a poor spec. 

In fact, the 997 Speedster offered one of the few ways to buy a wide body, two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated 911: in essence making it a special edition 997 GTS.  With the models sharing far more similarities than differences, one could even say that the 997 GTS Cabriolet and the 997 Speedster are fraternal twins.

Mechanically, the GTS Cabriolet and the Speedster are the same car with their key differences related mostly to cosmetics.  The following table outlines these differences:

Except for the windshield, most other cosmetic differences can be easily addressed with aftermarket parts; even the double-bubble clamshell is available for those wanting a Speedster look for their GTS.  

One notable mechanical difference between the two models is the transmission as the Speedster is only available with the PDK.  Porsche had just introduced the PDK with the 997.2 model, so many cars were spec-ed with the new gearbox from the factory.  For example, estimates show that more than 60% of the 2010 – 2012 GTS cars sold in North America also included the PDK.

That leaves us with price.  The $90k+ gap at launch has only continued to widen thanks to the Speedster’s limited production run.  The CLASSIC.COM Market Benchmark data shows a wide range between the GTS Cabriolet Manual/PDK and the Speedster:

 


If you’re a buy & hold collector, then the exclusivity of the Speedster will play in your favor, and the 997 version is likely a good model to hold in your portfolio.  However, if you’re a driver, then the 997 GTS Cabriolet offers an experience so close to a Speedster that few would notice the difference; at a fraction of the price and available with a 6 speed manual transmission as a bonus!  

PS: If that’s not enough to entice you, add that the next Speedster after the 997, the 991 launched in 2019, is based on the GT3 which is not available as a Cabriolet.  The 911 GTS Cabriolet is a Speedster for drivers and this is only true with the 997 generation.

 

What a difference a year makes.  While the fall of 2020 mostly kept us at home, this year has been a season for driving.

It started in September with a trip to Luft 7.  It was rescheduled from ‘20 and while a bit farther from home than North Carolina, we thought it would be a great drive.  The trip to Indy would give us a chance to really test the “T” in the 2016 GTS, and work in a run on the Schweinefiletring on the way.

Fuel stop before starting the Schweinefiletring.

The road conditions on the ‘ring were good.  It reminded us of our favorite North Georgia runs with smaller elevation changes.  Ultimately we only did the east side of the circuit as the traffic was moderate and the area was fairly residential.  

We had planned to run the west side of the ‘ring after Luft, but called an audible and attended the Porsche Togetherfest at Indianapolis Motor Speedway instead.  Not knowing what to expect at IMS, it actually became a high point of the trip with racing, fun, and free stuff for all.

The ‘16 GTS lived up to its billing as a touring car.  We had a couple of 7 hour days on the drive; it was comfortable and performed flawlessly.  The same trip just seems out of reach in the 997 mainly because of the centerlocks.  You are either carrying the tools with you or hoping that tire shop in the middle of nowhere has them.  Since the 991 was spec-ed with 5 lugs, it’s just not an issue.  The 991 cabin also feels a bit bigger and is better appointed with touring options like ventilated seats and improved Bluetooth support vs. the 997.

We had a few other minor car events in September and October, but the next major outing was the Rennsport Dragon Rally.  We opted to take both GTS cars to the event so we could switch between them over the three days where we logged over 700 miles through TN, NC, and GA.

Loading up for RDR.

The RDR is intense.  The terrain and pace favor the 997.  As I’ve mentioned, between the two cars the 997 is more sport than touring.  I find it instills more confidence when carving through the mountain roads.  Still as much as I prefer the 997 for a spirited drive, the 991 just looks better doing it.

The 991 looking good at RDR.

The event introduced us to a few great routes like Wayah Road south of 74 and 28 south of 74 into the Highlands.  Although we enjoyed the RDR, it’s probably not a repeat event for us.  Ultimately it’s hard to beat the roads in our backyard.  Early November gave us a chance to share them with our friends soon after they took delivery of a new Corvette.

Corvette sandwich in North Georgia.

It’s hard to beat the 60-180-19 loop in North Georgia.  It has something for everyone: tight corners and sweepers, climbs and descents, two lane sections for easy passing, relatively light traffic, beautiful scenery with ample look out points to stretch the legs, plus convenient stops on the route for food and gas.

It’s certainly fun to get out and explore new terrain.  It may even help you appreciate home even more.

An owner’s viewpoint on the knocks against the 911 cabriolet

Like any enthusiast, I watch car pricing, and it’s been especially interesting during the pandemic.  The forums are full of posts tracking the steep rise in prices with virtually all 911’s selling for what seem like record prices.

As members post links to cars, it’s not uncommon to see lengthy threads speculating on final hammer prices while debating the effect of attributes like color, options, and body style.  The latter is particularly interesting to me because Porsches tend to run counter to the norm.  While convertibles are typically more expensive than coupes, this rule of thumb doesn’t hold true with used 911’s; enthusiasts seem to prefer coupes.

As an owner of a 911 cabriolet, I’ll share my viewpoint on the knocks people seem to have against them.

Style is first on my list.  Like most cars, the 911 was designed first as a coupe and the flyline is optimized around that design.  Although more recent 911 generations have made strides in minimizing the flyline differences between the coupe and cabriolet, it just isn’t true with the 997 in my garage.  Dropping the top helps, but the style win still goes to the car with a fixed roof.

 

Next up is stiffness.  Typically convertibles flex more than coupes since the roof serves as a structural element in the body.  While that is also the case with the 911, Porsche went to great lengths to minimize this issue starting with the 997.  The development of the 997 actually started with the cabriolet.  The logic being that designing the more structurally challenging body style first would result in the coupe being even more rigid.  My seat-o-the-pants meter doesn’t sense any unwanted flex in the 997.

Barely lift the rear and the front comes up too!

Performance is another area to consider.  Here the argument is that since the cabriolet weighs more than the coupe, the coupe has a better power to weight ratio.  Focusing on the 997 generation, the cabriolet weighs about 300 lbs more than the coupe, 3,340 lbs vs 3,131 lbs, respectively.  Despite the weight difference, the cabriolet claims nearly the same performance figures as the coupe.  As an interesting point of minutia, the spoiler on a cabriolet raises slightly higher than on a coupe to compensate for the extra drag resulting from the canvas top.

A common criticism for convertibles of any mark is the increased road noise.  Again, with Porsche this criticism may run counter to the norm since most enthusiasts would tout noise as part of the connection with the car.  I certainly share this view, and appreciate any chance to drop the top and take a spirited drive.  Experiencing the exhaust roar with no more than air between my ear and the exhaust tip is incredible.   

The last point I’ll cover is safety.  Visibility is perhaps a mixed bag, although arguably better in a cabriolet than a couple when the top is down.  While the fixed roof offers more protection in a rollover accident, the cabriolet includes active safety bars that provide enough protection to qualify it for DE events.

In the end, cabriolets are a great option for someone buying their first 911.  Newer generations minimize the styling differences between the coupe and cabriolet and the other attributes are marginal.  Cabriolets have a clear lead in experiencing engine noises and offer a lower entry price point in most cases.  The 997 GTS cabriolet was my first 911, and I don’t think I could ever part with it.

The 997 GTS showing it’s best side.

comparing the interiors of the 991 and 997 GTS

A subscriber suggested comparing the interiors of the 991 and 997.  It was an excellent suggestion.  I thought it would be interesting to focus on a “Top 3” for each of the cars.

Let’s start w/ the 997 since it’s the older of the two.  The interior of this car feels more open vs. the 991.  Much of this feel likely stems from the height of the center console.  It’s lower in the 997.  Even though it seems marginal in the photos comparing the two, it makes a difference in the way the cars feel.  Sometimes less is more, and this is one of those times.

 

Second up in my list of three is the analog gauges.  Both cars have the typical 911 style set-up with a tachometer in the center flanked by two smaller gauges on each side.  All five of the gauges in the 997 are analog.  Porsche began the shift to digital with the 991 which includes one digital and four analog gauges.  In the 992, only the tachometer remains in analog form.  Perhaps it’s similar to my impression of the interior.  Analog just feels more inline with the ethos of the 911.

 

Last on the list for the 997 is the alcantara.  People either love it or hate it.  I’m with the former group.  It wears well.  It’s easy to clean, and it gives you a bit more friction than leather which helps to keep you in place on a spirited drive.  The one exception is the steering wheel.  It feels and looks like an old sweater.  I could replace it with a leather wrapped wheel.  The bolsters of the seats are in leather, so it would integrate well.

The alcantara on the wheel shows wear.

Let’s turn our attention to the 991.  I love the GT steering wheel.  It was added by the original owner of this car which is great because I probably wouldn’t have opted for the switch myself.  It has a smaller radius and more girth.  You notice it.  I prefer the feel so much that I’ll likely replace the wheel in the 997 with a GT wheel as well.

Alcantara seats are standard issue in the 911 GTS.  The original owner of the 991 opted for leather ventilated seats.  As much as I love the alcantara in the 997, the ventilated seats are fabulous on a hot summer day.  In comparing these two GTS cars, I’ve described the 991 as more T and the 997 as more S.  Ventilated seats are great in a grand touring car.

Rounding out the list of three for the 991 is the lip on the backside of the rear seats.  It helps to hold the cargo in place when you are using the rear seats in a folded down position.  I like this feature because it shows the spirit of 911 design.  Aero and power are always in focus as Porsche refines the 911 from one generation to the next, but so are features as seemingly insignificant as the back of the seats.  Everything is important. 

Just enough to keep the bags in place.

 

I’ve said it before when comparing the 991 GTS to the 997 GTS, the former is more T while the latter is more S.  In the 9 months that I’ve owned the 991, I really haven’t had a chance to drive it for more than a few hundred miles at a time.  My claim that it’s the better tourer of the two has been largely untested until now.

The last fun trip we took pre-pandemic was to Amelia Island for the Concours Weekend in March 2020, so it seems fitting that the first fun trip scheduled post-pandemic was Amelia 2021.  The 800 mile round trip drive offered a chance to take the 991 on the tour required to test my claim.

Eastbound & Down in the 991 GTS on the way to Amelia Island

I stand behind my claim when comparing the 991 to the 997.  The 991 is far more comfortable over a distance.  It feels bigger and more planted on the road, even though it weighs less than my 997 (i.e. 3,197 for the 991 coupe vs. 3,340 for the 997 cabriolet).  

The 5 lug wheels reduce the worry of a mid-trip flat, and comfort features like the ventilated seats are wonderful on a long trip.  Though I generally prefer the 6 speed in the 997 to the 7 speed in the 991, on the highway I found the extra gear quite useful as an “overdrive”.  And the power; there is plenty on tap even in 7th gear at 70+ mph.

So yes, the 991 is a better tourer than the 997.  However, the surprise for me was realizing that most of my claim is supported by the 997 not being much of a tourer rather than the 991 being particularly good at it.

It’s a stiff ride, even when running in normal mode (i.e. Sport Plus disabled).  Clean asphalt is ok.  Concrete is pretty bad.  The car telegraphs every joint in the road.  The low profile tires produce significant road noise, and the Bose stereo isn’t strong enough to mask it without sounding distorted.

The good outweighs the bad in my estimation, and I’ll still road trip the 991.  I’m just better informed now and looking forward to the next chance I get!

As expected, the triple play of Werks, Cars & Coffee, and the Concours put a number of great cars at arms length:

A blue 550 Spyder.  One of many highlights from the weekend’s events.

This drive was a morning run in the North Georgia Mountains.  The recorded portion is around 60 miles with a few stops along the way including lunch at JR’s BBQ.

Conditions: Clear skies.  65 – 70 degrees. 

Trip notes: The HWY 60-180-19 loop is a favorite of mine in a car or on a bike.  I think of it as the Georgia version of the Dragon’s Tail.  Wolf Pen Gap / HWY 180 is best on a bike while the portion of the run on HWY 19 is best in a car with nice sweepers.  Add a stop at T.W.O. or Turner’s Corner for breakfast or lunch.

Relive ‘Wolf Pen Gap Loop’

Is the M491 really a 911 GTS?

The essence of a GTS.  It’s the focus here at GTSence.  I’ve written about models like the 991 GTS and 997 GTS, and plan to explore both in more depth.  Porsche offers the GTS as a model across their range, as do other manufacturers.  

Photo courtesy of Porsche.

Though the first 911 GTS came with the 997.2 in 2011, I’ve wondered if Porsche produced earlier 911 models with the essence of a GTS; perhaps even an air cooled version. 

Many of the mechanical features that make a 911 GTS can be ordered as options on any 911 model from the factory: alcantera, center locking wheels, X51 Powerkit, etc.  While these features certainly help to create the essence of a GTS, they are less special than one particular feature that cannot be ordered as an option: the wide body design.

With the 997 Porsche offered just two ways to buy a wide body, two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated car: the GTS and GT3 RS.  Although the number of choices doubled with the 991, the wide body, two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated design was still limited to the GTS, 911R, GT3, and GT3 RS.  In my opinion, the wide body design is a defining feature for any 911 that can be said to have a GTSence; more specifically a wide body, two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated design.

While Porsche didn’t use the GTS badge, I think there is an air cooled car that has the essence of a GTS.  From 1984 – 89, Porsche offered the Carrera 3.2 with an optional M491 “Turbo Look” package which included: 

  • Wide body design
  • Whale tail style spoiler (or M470 spoiler delete)
  • Wrap around chin spoiler
  • Turbo suspension, wheels, tires and brakes 

The  M491 “Turbo Look” (aka SSE for Special Sport Equipment or simply SuperSport in other countries) sounds remarkably similar to a modern 911 GTS with both design and performance upgrades including what I consider to be a defining feature: a wide body design in a two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated package.

Photo courtesy of Ted7 https://www.instagram.com/iamted7/

In my estimation, the M491 is essentially an air cooled 911 GTS!  Here’s a great resource for those interested in the Turbo Look cars: https://www.turbo-look.com/

 

what makes a 911 GTS Porsche

The 991 was a completely new platform for Porsche, and only the third since the 911 was introduced.  The 901 was first, followed by the 996, and then the 991.  It was also the first platform introduced after Porsche had become part of VAG, though the design work was completed prior to the acquisition.

The new platform introduced a number of changes over the 996/997 generation cars; longer wheelbase, wider front track, lower roofline, significant interior upgrades, and more.  Many say the car is more of a tourer than prior generations, and this is inline with my own impressions after my first back to back drive of the 997 and 991 GTS cars.  

In time, I’ll share my impressions on some of the non-GTS specific features introduced with the 991 including electronic assisted steering, the 7 speed manual, the electronic parking brake and more.  Like others who have shared opinions on the 991, I have mixed feelings about some of these “improvements”.

Back to the topic at hand, which is what makes a 991 GTS?  The recipe is largely the same as what makes a 997 GTS: design and performance.

The most visual difference in my opinion is the wide body design.  With the 991 Porsche offered four ways to buy a wide body, two-wheel drive naturally aspirated 911: the GTS, 911R, GT3, and GT3 RS.  Note that the first three are 1,852 mm, while the GT3 RS offers an even wider body at 1,880 mm. 

Other design changes for the exterior included darkened lights, black centerlock wheels, Sport Design front spoiler & exterior mirrors, a black engine grille & rear louvers.  On the inside of the 991 GTS you’ll find Sport Plus seats, Alcantara upholstery with contrasting stitching, black gauges and anodized black aluminum trim.  Features could be optioned out, for instance my GTS is equipped with 5 lug wheels and leather seats.

Performance improvements include Porsche Torque Vectoring (PTV), Porsche Active Suspension Management (PASM), and the X51 Powerkit which adds 30 hp to the 3.8 liter using modified cylinder heads & camshafts, a variable resonance intake plenum with switchable valves to act like ITBs, and adjustments to the ECU.  Peak torque doesn’t change, but is moved up in the RPM range for “usability” on the street. 

Excerpt from Porsche Engineering Magazine. (Link to Full Article)

 

For the true enthusiasts, a few GTS trivia nuggets in closing.  The 991.1 GTS was the first GTS available in Targa form, and the last 991.1 GTS (i.e. the last naturally aspirated GTS) was in Carmine Red.

sound comparison between the 991 and 997 Porsche GTS

My first post comparing the 991 and 997 included a small reference to the differences between how the cars sound.  I’ve wanted to spend more time on this topic, and finally had the opportunity to do it.

Sound is such an important part of the experience for me.  Like many enthusiasts, I rarely listen to the radio in my cars.  I’d rather listen to the road noise, the intake and of course the exhaust.

For this sound comparison between the 991 and 997, we’ll focus on the sound from inside the cabin.  I’ve included a few recordings below; the sound is predominately the exhaust.  I may try to isolate the intake sounds by mounting a mic in the engine bay for a future post.

The set-up was simple.  I used an Android App called ASR with my phone secured in a cradle mounted on the inside of the front windshield.  The driver and passenger windows were open for all four recordings.  The 997 has a SharkWerks cross pipe, and the 991 is a stock set-up.  Both cars were in Sport Plus mode.

In the first set of recordings, I’m coming out of a roundabout into a moderate uphill climb with a slight curve.  I’m on the throttle, but never to red line.  

The run in the 997 starts in first, you hear a shift to second, and then a shift to third near the end of the recording.

The run in the 991 starts in first, you hear the shift to second and third, then a downshift to second.  The higher RPMs after the downshift probably create a bit of an “apples to oranges” situation.  The 991 reved-up in 2nd gear is putting out more sound at the end of the run than the 997 in third.

In the second set of recordings, I’m turning onto a street that is level for the length of the run.  As with the first set of recordings, I’m on the throttle, but never to red line.  

The run in the 997 starts in first, you hear a shift to second, and then a shift to third near the end of the recording.

The run in the 991 also starts in first, you hear a shift to second, and then a shift to third near the end of the recording.  

The 997 has a higher pitched sound that starts low and continues across the rev range.  I’ve described it as “angry”, and I’ve noticed that it turns more heads in a way that reminds me of that great Ferrari-Shell commercial from ~2007.  I’m not claiming that the 997 sounds like an F1 car, only that it turns heads when you are on the throttle.  

The 991 has a deeper sound.  It’s not loud until you hit ~4000 RPMs, but then it comes on strong and sounds “deeper” than the 997.  Some say it sounds more “powerful”.  I like the sound, but there is something about it that seems artificial in comparison to the 997.

It’s not in the recordings above, but both cars produce the “race car” burble and crackle.  I notice the burble more in the 997.  Coast down hill while barely pressing the accelerator and it will burble the whole way.  Thanks to ECU gamesmanship the 991 crackles more on the overrun.  Go hard on the throttle, then lift for a shift and it sounds like a shotgun. 

History of the wide body 911 Porsche & why it matters

One of the defining features of the GTS is the wide body design.  With both the 997.2 and 991.1 generation cars, the GTS is one of the few possible paths to buying a naturally aspirated, two-wheel drive wide body 911 Porsche.

For both GTS variants, the wide body design adds 22 mm to each side for a more muscular appearance.  The change offers more than improved looks though, a wide body stance also offers advantages to the performance minded.  Keep reading below for more info on the history of the wide body including which 911 models use this design, then check out our related post for bonus info on the performance advantages of a wide body design.

I was curious to understand how performance is affected by a wide body design, and also wondered when the first wide body 911 Porsche was introduced.  The first Porsche that I remember noticing as a kid was the 70’s era 911 RS/RSR; the wide body was a prominent design element for those cars.

Above: P-911 in Super Chrome; original owner since 1976

In fact, the ‘73 Carrera 2.7 RS is the first 911 to wear the wide body design, followed by the RSR in ‘74.  As these were limited production models, many would say a wide body 911 Porsche model really didn’t become mainstream until the introduction of the 911 Turbo in ‘75 in Europe (‘76 in the US), and it has remained a defining feature of the model since.

Above: 1976 911 Turbo Carrera. Photo courtesy of PCA. For full details see: https://www.pca.org/news/2018-08-10/model-guide-porsche-911-turbo-all-generations

By the 1980’s enthusiasts began welding arches on to naturally aspirated 911’s to achieve the muscular look of the Turbo.  Porsche embraced this interest and began to offer Turbo-look cars that adopted the wide body design in addition to other enhancements.  Optioned as the M491 or Turbo-Look package starting in 1984, the cars were initially given a wide body stance by attaching arches to a narrow body car.  By 1986 Porsche began producing the M491 cars using a wide body side panel.

Above: 1985 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet Turbo Look. Photo courtesy of PCA. For full details see: https://www.pca.org/news/2017-10-20/model-guide-1984-1989-porsche-911-carrera

Next came a range of special edition two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated cars in wide body including the 3.2 Speedster, 964 Speedster, the America Roadster, and other models available outside the US.  Porsche then went with a wide body layout for all 993 Carrera S cars only to revert back to a narrow body design for all 996 two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated cars sold in the US (i.e. the GT3 RS was a notable wide body exception in the 996 range, but was not available in the US market).

The 997 generation offered two wide body options in a two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated format, the GTS (and GTS-based special editions like the Speedster) and GT3 RS.  With the 991 the line-up became a bit more complex.  The GTS (and GTS-based special editions like the 50th Anniversary 911), 911 R, and GT3 models were built with a 1,852 mm wide body design, while the GT3 RS used a 1,880 mm “ultra wide body” shared with the 911 Turbo.  With the introduction of the 992, Porsche announced that all models will be delivered in wide body.

With the history of the wide body as a backdrop, let’s shift the focus to performance.  In this area, there are two factors to consider: traction and suspension dynamics.  A wide body design allows for a bigger tire while keeping the wheels inboard of the bodywork.  The larger tire contact patch results in increased traction which supports more power for performance oriented driving.

A wide body design can also affect suspension dynamics such as body roll and over/under steer.  In simple terms, stability is increased as the wheels are pushed outward from the centerline of the car.  Read more about how a wide body design affects performance in this post comparing a 997 GTS and Carrera S.

This drive was the monthly Peachstate PCA tour.  It was a 120 mile trip ending at the Barber Motorsports Park and Museum in Birmingham, Alabama.

Conditions: Clear skies.  65 – 70 degrees. 

Trip notes: Most of the trip was on I-20 where some sections were under construction.  The trip included a tour of the museum and parade labs on the track.

Relive ‘PCA Tour – Barber Motorsports Park Parade Laps’

what makes a 911 GTS Porsche

It’s a Carrera S with a few extra boxes checked on the options sheet.  That’s the answer you’ll often hear when the question is what’s a GTS?  For those in the know, that response sells it short a bit since it isn’t possible to transform a Carrera S into a GTS with a mouse click on the Porsche Car Configurator.

A better informed response shows two dimensions to what makes a 911 GTS: design and performance.

There were only two ways to buy a wide body, two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated 997: the GTS and GT3 RS.  You could also count special models like the Sport Classic and Speedster, but these are really just GTS cars in disguise.  While the difference seems marginal (i.e. 44 mm wider than the narrow body Carerra), the wider rear track and muscular haunches are noticed by both the eye and the seat.  A wide body car has a more aggressive look and offers more grip for the performance minded; it’s also a feature that makes it impossible to build a GTS from a two-wheel drive Carrera S.

Photo courtesy of CarsAddiction.com. For full details see: https://www.carsaddiction.com/articles/2019/12/porsche-997-buying-guide

The GTS is marked by several other design details inside and outside of the car.  A GT3 inspired interior includes a SportDesign steering wheel, plus liberal use of Alcantara across the seat centers and anywhere else the driver and passenger make contact with the car (e.g. steering wheel, arm rests, gear and handbrake levers).

Exterior design elements include a SportDesign front apron with a black spoiler edge, plus a blacked-out rear valance and sideskirts.  One controversial feature is the use of the centerlock RS Spyder wheels.  Either loved or hated, the 19 inch wheels are also blacked-out and only available as a standard feature on the GTS and Turbo. 

Performance is the second dimension that makes a GTS.  Though unlike the wide body design that is only available on a Carrera 4S, a Carrera S or 4S buyer could order the X51 Powerkit option to match a GTS spec.  This $16,900 option was standard equipment on a GTS and raised horsepower to 408 while moving the maximum torque output of 310 lb ft to the 4,200 RPM rev mark which is 200 RPMs earlier in the rev range in comparison to the standard 3.8-liter engine.

The X51 Powerkit offered these improvement thanks to modified cylinder heads, a carbon-fiber air filter casing, a new variable resonance intake manifold with six tuning flaps vs. a single flap on the standard engine, a sports exhaust system featuring specially designed twin dual-tube tailpipes and modified engine management.

As an enthusiast, it’s important to understand the specs that define the car while also recognizing that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.  It’s the latter that explains why Porsche calls the GTS, “the pinnacle of the Carerra lineup”.

Porsche 911 aftermarket warranty analysis

It’s a common topic on the forums.  Someone buys a Porsche.  The OEM warranty is expired, but an aftermarket warranty is available.  What should you do?  Faced with this situation recently, I decided to share my analysis which resulted in a decision against the aftermarket warranty.

I bought a 991 from a West coast broker (backstory).  It was a low mileage car, and I was able to talk with the original owner as part of the due diligence.  Though I was encouraged by the narrative, I still opted to have a Prepurchase Inspection (PPI) completed at a West coast Porsche dealership.  I talked to the service tech during the process and asked if the car would be eligible for CPO.  Of course it is a requirement that the car is sold by a Porsche dealership to be eligible for CPO, but I thought of the question as a litmus test to gauge the overall condition of the car.

We also discussed other options for aftermarket warranties, and the service tech suggested that I follow-up with my local Porsche dealership since they frequently sell these warranties in addition to offering CPO cars.  I sent the VIN# and mileage to my local dealership for an estimate.  They responded with the following proposal:

There are a few notable differences between CPO and other aftermarket warranties like the EasyCare VSC option presented to me by the dealership.  For example, with EasyCare VSC you can select mileage limits, term, and a deductible to arrive at a package tailored for you.  Another difference is that the coverage includes wheel and tire care, whereas the CPO program does not.

Armed with the terms of the warranty, I was ready to make a decision based on data.  I thought it might be useful to analyze my 997 ownership experience with and without the warranty as a proxy for the 991.

I’ve owned the 997 since 2013, so naturally there have been repairs in addition to the required maintenance.  I used the costs of the repairs to evaluate if an aftermarket warranty would have benefited me financially.

The table below shows the costs that I incurred for three repairs without warranty coverage, plus the cost of the repairs with a $500 deductible EasyCare VSC warranty.  After factoring in the cost of the warranty (note: I chose the lowest cost option available from EasyCare VSC), the analysis shows that I was approximately $300 ahead without the warranty.

I support local businesses as much as possible, so the repairs on the 997 were completed at an independent shop, not a Porsche dealership.  Had the work been completed at a dealership, the repair costs likely would have been higher and the warranty would have been more advantageous financially.

Also, though I’m annoyed that the 997 required these repairs, they are more minor in scope.  Higher cost repairs (e.g. PDK replacement) would have also made the aftermarket warranty more advantageous financially.

Finally, as with any analysis, your mileage may vary as may my experience with the 991 vs. 997.  Here’s hoping for the best!

 

This drive was the monthly Peachstate PCA tour.  It was a 90 mile trip ending at the Miles Through Time Museum in Clarkesville, GA.

Conditions: Clouds, turning to rain.  75 – 80 degrees.  Roads were clean and well surfaced.

Trip notes: The route was “highway commute” miles until US 129 / GA 11 / GA 75 at approximately 57 miles.  The museum staff was friendly, but the exhibit was small (i.e. 20 – 25 cars).  The collection changes periodically as the cars are on loan from the owners.  On this trip Model A’s plus other notable cars (e.g. Ed Bolian’s Cannonball cars) were featured.  We stopped for lunch at the Midtown Grill in Clarkesville; the burgers were excellent.

Relive ‘PCA Drive – Miles Through Time Museum’

The history of the GTS and Porsche

For me, the GTS feels like a spec created for the 911, perfectly bridging the road-focused Carrera S and the track-focused GT3.  Representing the best of both worlds, the Grand Turismo Sport delivers it all in a single model.

Though in my opinion the 911 GTS is arguably the best execution of the spec, it is not the first or the only GTS.  Many other marques have worn these letters including Ferrari, Maserati, Dodge, Holden, Toyota, and even Vespa!  In time, we may have the opportunity to examine each of these specimens, but my primary interest is with the history of the GTS and Porsche. 

The 911 wasn’t even the first Porsche to bear the GTS badge.  That honor goes to the 904, a mid-engined, race car from the 1960’s.  The Porsche 904 GTS was built to compete in the popular Gran Turismo racing classes, but still capable of being driven on the road.  First entered in the 1964 World Sportscar Championship, the 904 GTS won the manufacturer’s world championship in 1964 and 1965.

This race-before-road design ethos continued into the 1980’s with the 924 Carrera GTS, before the 928 GTS was introduced in the 1990’s as the first GTS to perhaps emphasize touring over sport; a trend that continued with the 2008 Cayenne GTS that followed the 928.  

It wasn’t until the 991 launch was approaching, that Porsche gave us the 911 GTS as a swansong to the 997.2.  Most of what makes a GTS can be spec-ed from the factory as a well appointed Carrera S (i.e. Alcantara, Centerlocks, X50 Powerkit) with one notable exception.  There were only two ways to buy a wide body, two-wheel drive, naturally aspirated 997: the GTS and GT3 RS.  You could also count special models like the Sport Classic and Speedster, but these are really just GTSs in disguise.

Given the GTS’s popularity, Porsche offered it with both generations of the 991, and it should be no surprise that a 992 GTS is in development.

Perhaps no other manufacturer has offered as many GTS models.  The entire family of Porsche cars are available in GTS form, except for the new Taycan – though who knows what the future holds.

First Impressions of Porsche 991.1 GTS vs 997 GTS

You never get a second chance to make a first impression.  Having never driven a 991, I was curious to see how it would stack up against my 997.  It was a long wait, but the car finally arrived from the West coast (backstory).

997 & 991 Together for an Event

This was my one and only chance to get the first impression of the Porsche 991.1 GTS vs 997 GTS.  The day was nice, somewhat cooler than typical with clear skies.  It was midday, so traffic was not a factor.

Both cars are GTSs, and only a generation apart.  That’s understating it a bit though.  The 997 was the last car designed and built while Porsche was an independent company.  With the 991 they had become part of Volkswagen Group.

What surprised me the most was how different the cars felt.  Having driven a 992, I probably should have seen this coming.  The 991 feels more like a 992 than a 997.  It simply feels bigger than a 997.  I felt bad saying it though because that’s generally not the way you’d describe a sports car that you like, yet I like the way the 991 feels.  It has a certain heft to it.  Like the way a nice tool feels in your hand.  

It is bigger than a 997.  At least when measured by wheelbase: 93” for the 997 and 96” for the 991.  Here’s the surprise though.  The 991 barely weighs more than the 997: 3,197 lbs for the 991 vs. 3,131 lbs for the 997!  My 997 cabriolet is of course heavier than both coupes with a curb weight of 3,340 lbs.  I didn’t expect it.  The 991 is more nicely appointed, and conventional wisdom tells you that cars continue to gain significant weight with each new generation.

The 991 seemed to reach a proper operating temperature faster than the 997 does and with that hurdle cleared, I was able to open the car up.  The exhaust doesn’t really come alive until you’re over 4,000 RPMs.  Though the note is great, deep with the appropriate burbles in sport mode, it’s not as raw as the 997.  In fairness, the 997 is running a SharkWerks cross pipe; it sounds angry, but in a good way.  It’s one of my favorite things about the 997; heads turn to see what’s coming.

As I downshifted to make a turn, I made another discovery.  Auto Rev-Match wants to do the work for you.  To be honest it threw me off in the same way that Drive-Off Assistant did the first time I noticed it in the 997.  I learned to drive on a manual and haven’t owned an automatic as my primary car since then.  The experience is second nature to me.  When the car does it for you, it just feels odd at first.  Double tap turns off the Drive-Off Assistant.  Apparently it is not possible to turn off Auto Rev-Match in Sport+ mode.

Despite the summer heat, I had the sunroof open and windows down.  It’s really the best way to experience the car; minimize what separates you and the noisy, fun parts of the car.  With the midday sun heating up the cabin, I started to reach for the AC controls before remembering that the original owner spec-ed the car with ventilated seats! 

I’d like to say it hit me the moment that I turned on the ventilated seats, but it was later.  I was home, reflecting on the experience and trying to describe the difference between the cars.  Both are GTSs.  With one you get more T, and the other more S.

The 997 is more visceral.  It’s swift, nimble and seems like it has the playfulness of a lighter car.  My first impression says it is the sporty of the two.  The 991 is more refined.  It’s planted, well mannered until you take it above 4,000 RPMs.  It tries harder to impress you with its rev-matches, gurgle on the overrun, and create comforts.  I suspect it will be the better tourer. 

I’ve also noticed another big difference between these cars, though it’s not in the spec.  Most people don’t give the Meteor Grey 997 a second look.  The Voodoo Blue 991 though; it makes friends everywhere it goes.

A 2016 VooDoo Blue Porsche 911 Carrera GTS being unloaded from a truck.

backstory behind buying my 991.1 GTS Porsche

The first Porsche that I noticed as a kid was the 70’s era 911 RS/RSR.  There is no shortage of reasons to covet those cars, if not for the wide body and ducktail alone.  Add a Brumos or Martini livery for the Triple Crown in styling.

 

Side view of a Brumos Liveried 911 Porsche RSR at the Porsche Experience Center in Atlanta, GA.
Brumos Liveried RSR at PEC Atlanta.

With a wide body and ducktail, the 911 GTS-based 2016 PCA 60th Anniversary cars were just one crown short of the triple.  Take the iconic styling, plus my affection for the GTS line and my wife’s urging to buy a “blue Porsche”, and you could build a pretty good case for adding one to the garage.

I wasn’t in a position to buy a PCA 60th Anniversary car in 2016, even if I could have won a spot in the drawing.  By 2019 that position had changed though, so I set out to find one.

A few low mileage specimens were available around the country, but the asking prices were stratospheric.  One slipped away on Bring a Trailer at a very reasonable price while no one was watching during the Christmas break.  Another came up for sale in the middle of nowhere which made a PPI nearly impossible; another miss.  Then came the chance to bid on a PCA 60th car at the Amelia Island Gooding auction in March 2020.

We planned to attend the Amelia event during the weekend.  The car was scheduled for auction on Friday.  Not a problem since online bidding was an option.  I registered, set a bid ceiling, and signed in from home.  Covid-19 was just starting to look serious in the US.  I was certain that it would affect bidding.  Giving me a shot at winning the auction with ease.  We could pick up the car when we arrived at Amelia Island for the weekend concours events.

I was in the game with the high bid several times before another bidder took the price above my ceiling.  It was tough, but I exercised the discipline.  Someone else is driving that car now!

 

A front view of a 2016 Porsche 911 PCA 60th Anniversary Car at Amelia Island.
A PCA 60th Anniversary Car at Amelia Island.

I continued to think about the PCA 60th cars over the next few months.  In early June, a GTS was listed in The Mart at PCA.com.  It had clearly been spec-ed to look like one of the 60 PCA cars.  I hesitated, and few days later the car was gone.  I missed another one!

Like most enthusiasts, I look at car listings daily.  To my surprise a GTS was listed by an exotics broker on the West Coast just a short time after the car on The Mart disappeared.  It had to be the same car; a bit of internet sleuthing proved it.

I was able to talk to the original owner (OO).  Once I heard the story, I knew it was the car I wanted.  His story is now part of the backstory behind buying my 991.1 GTS Porsche.

The OO is in the car business on the West coast.  He has owned several Porsches over the years, and is a PCA member.  When the PCA 60th cars were announced, he and a friend decided to enter the drawing.  Only one of them pulled a golden ticket!

The two friends decided to order two cars together anyway, with one spec-ing a legit PCA 60th Anniversary car and the other spec-ing a standard GTS to match.  The paperwork made it all the way through the regional and US systems before the Germans kicked it back.  Only PCA cars could be ordered in Club Blau.  A hilarious exchange ensued after a BMW PTS color was requested before the OO settled on Voodoo Blue.

Several other features were added for comfort and to complete the retro look, all of which made the spec even more appealing to me.  The car even has the Fuchs-style wheels that adorned the PCA 60th cars, although even that involves a story.  The factory refused to sell those wheels as an option after delivery without a VIN for a PCA 60th car; a situation rectified with a call to a friend who was lucky enough to have one!

Think of it as PCA #61!  We both tried and failed to get a legitimate 60th anniversary car.  Being in the car business, the OO knew how to work the system to his advantage.  An impostor was born!  The backstory made it all more appealing to me. 

Enjoying a drive in a 2011 997 Carrera GTS Cabriolet with the top down.

backstory behind buying my 997 GTS Porsche

I’ve been a car guy for as long as I can remember; Hot Wheels, Revell models, all the usual fixes.  A taproot car for me was a 1999 Miata that I purchased new.  Though it wasn’t my first car purchase, it was the first time that I could afford to buy what I wanted.  It was a sport spec with the Bilsteins, strut tower brace, and other performance bits included from the factory.  I still remember it as one of the best cars that I’ve owned.

I wrenched on that car because I wanted to learn, and because I couldn’t afford to buy the upgrades plus pay someone to install them.  One of my mods was an oil filter relocation kit.  It moved the filter to the firewall, so it was easier to access.  Well, one day the kit failed.  The engine lost oil pressure and was damaged.  In a move I still regret, I decided to sell the car.

 

When I sold the Miata, I replaced it with an S2000.
Goodbye ’99 Miata , Hello ’06 S2000.

It was 2006.  Though I liked the Miata, I wanted something upmarket with more power.  I cross-shopped the Boxster and the S2000.  I took the lower cost choice and drove the Honda until I traded it for a 997 GTS.  

The next part of this backstory behind buying my 997 GTS Porsche must be one of the longest sales cycles in history.  When I drove the Boxster in 2006, the Porsche salesman was really a great guy.  He spent the time sharing his knowledge of the brand and treated me well even though it was clear the Boxster was likely a stretch.  He actually referred me to his friend at a Honda dealership who sold me the S2000.

By 2013 I was ready for a Porsche.  I drove to the dealership, walked up the receptionist, and asked if Richard happened to still work there.  He did.

We picked up right where we had left off 7 years earlier.  He asked if I’d ever driven a 911, grabbed a set of keys, and off we went in a black, 997 Carrera Cabriolet.  I knew in less than a mile that I wanted one.

 

When I sold the S2000, I replaced it with a 997 GTS.
Goodbye ’06 S2000, Hello ’11 997 GTS.

Being an astute salesman, Richard nudged me towards the 997 GTS that I now own.  As they say, the rest is history.

It’s hard to image parting with the 997.  It was my first Porsche.  It was the first car each of my kids drove when they earned their learner’s permit.  Though I admittedly prefer the flyline of a coupe, the cabriolet is especially nice for the exhaust noises and the openness of the cabin.